Arguing from dependent origination to no-self is fallacious. A child is born of a mother but that does not mean the child does not exist. That we are embedded in a world and are beings who must respond to that world does not negate that we are still independent beings with a separate self. Buddhism trying to argue otherwise is like trying to argue that circles are not round. Absurd, fallacious, self-refuting. I addressed that here: https://medium.com/inserting-philosophy/interdependence-does-not-mean-lack-of-individuation-ec8db0b45b9c and here https://medium.com/original-philosophy/an-overly-brief-cosmology-of-consciousness-3049ead850b3

Granted, many people do not understand what freedom means, so can fall into such absurdities. https://medium.com/inserting-philosophy/does-anyone-understand-what-freedom-means-656890c38818