Member-only story

Artists, You Will Never Recapture 1870s Paris

Let go of pretension and move on

--

Claude Monet, Impression, Sunrise (1872)

There’s a mystique of “being an artist” — the artist as rebel. It’s the idolization of the artist as the rogue creative genius who sneers at convention, a virtual deity among mere mortals. Think Picasso, Dali, Rodin, and Gauguin among others. The hagiography of the holy egoism of genius excuses substance abuse, sexual promiscuity, and generally being an ass.

This mystique has more than one cause, of course. Artists have been temperamental for centuries. One particular cause of the mystification stands out, though: an art movement that truly was the rebellious, avant-garde sneer at convention that many artists idolize.

No doubt, you’ve heard of impressionism. Today, impressionist paintings are a staple of coffee mugs, comme il faut mass-produced art prints sold in department stores, and other forms of middle-class conformity. The casual and bland ubiquity of impressionist art today sharply contradicts its iconoclastic beginnings. Impressionism was a militant art movement, one that many artists in the 150 years since have tried to reproduce.

Paris: 1872

Consider French artist Claude Monet (1840–1926) and his painting of boats in the morning haze, Impression, Sunrise (1872). This humble painting led to huge changes.

Claude Monet, Impression, Sunrise (1872)

Not that the painting occurred in isolation, of course. Nothing does. Here is some context to understand the social and philosophical significance of Monet’s painting.

In the 1860s, the French art scene was dominated by the institution of the French Academy of Fine Arts. In particular, they controlled what artworks were exhibited at the Paris Salon, the largest and most influential juried art exhibition in France. The jury of the Academy tended to accept only paintings that displayed the stolid, traditional realist style of painting. That style included the standard that the painter’s brushstrokes were blended to invisibility to be as realistic as possible. The Academy also greatly preferred paintings that were portraits or of historical, religious, or…

--

--

Douglas Giles, PhD
Douglas Giles, PhD

Written by Douglas Giles, PhD

Philosopher by trade & temperament, professor for 21 years, bringing philosophy out of its ivory tower and into everyday life. https://dgilesauthor.com/

Responses (3)