Thanks. On "non-binary," like any label, it can be weaponized, and has been when people pit "non-binary" against "binary" in a normative value judgment. What some people don't realize, don't want to realize, is that binary vs. non-binary has always been a basis for normative judgments that lead to oppression of those who don't conform to the binary stereotypes of "men" and "women. Simply flipping the labels around and saying that "non-binary" people are "free" and "binary" or "cis" people are not, is just repeating the same patterns of stereotyping and normative judgments. Even if someone is simply saying they are "non-binary" as being outside of the norms of "men" and "women," they are still defining their self in terms of stereotypes and remain trapped in a binary opposition of" binary" vs. "non-binary."

Best to just be yourself and not let the war over labels define you.